About your Search

20130420
20130420
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4
for by taxes. you might have to pay more taxes if you get more government services. but at the same time, many of the same americans who an in a limited government way when asked that question by pollsters do not in fact want the federal government to stop doing a lot of things it currently does. or don't see it as having a immediate or near term cost to them. i think there are two examples we enhance late as well. i'm going to focus on people more conservative than moderate. the new york thymes did a story on the tea party, than quoted a woman named jo i did white. she said she was conflicted with the entitlement and things like that. he said, you know, i guess i want my social security, and smaller government too. which is, you know, there are people who are ought to be more familiar with the workings of the federal budget than random people quoted in news stories who nevertheless take this similar viewpoint. dick morris, the political consult assistant who moved from the democrat to the republicans who is famous for the prediction of the romney presidency -- [laughter] that very, you know,
to address income inequality and the way to do that is what we do with tax dollars is relevant for fiscal balance and variable to with the importance. >> two parts presentation. what are the lessons. second, put this country in a position in the interest of learning, and lessons from abroad. wouldn't have the grotesque system, what would be an example if the united states has already learned, would make you hopeful? >> we are both gathering our data. sometimes you have to build it. evidence of things not seen. >> a small question, and -- i don't know whether you are saying the united states development program, anything in the area of economic growth, some of the things he said. after three other things. the economic growth area, i can see a different event developing the underprivileged, legal system, the vital economy, talked about some of the time, my bigger question is, sort of an eclectic, that we have certain sensibles in development and develop questions, every situation is quite complex. privatization is commonly used as the state runs everything, but selling the water system and
a tax are still of a system of support of the christian churches broadly speaking or tax to support a christian ministers even though the others will have for freedom to continue their breakfast. of course it was jefferson's you the concept of freedom as opposed to the concept of mere tolerance of the dynamics that comes out of the statute. and so it not only influenced the federal constitution. also enclosed the development of the church-state relationship other states. not all states are completely separated by church and state. in the early years a result of the federal government that was bound by the first amendment. no one thought that control the state's cents stateside massachusetts had a step was church well into the 1880's and a lot of that is the influence of the statute. it's more important that people sometimes -- if they know about all. a remarkable thing is that jefferson himself made this just a couple of weeks before died. he wrote out a little thing and how he wanted to be remembered. as tested is tombstone and now he wondered engraved. one of the things you want t
billion tax growth. that is exactly. fiscal policy. hanson grasshoppers. that is discipline. clarity. the clarity, want to tell you the story. not jamaica, but the tiny elephant. in 1992 barbados faced an enormous financial interest, a potential financial crisis. the u.s., heavily dependent. the exports the rest of the world. in barbados dementia national monetary fund. barbados had what's cled a face to exchange is case the billion dollars. the country command the same way the value in the currency. making it cheaper and more expensive there will allow you to read just. the said, we don't think so. we don't like cutting wages. that's what a devaluation is. a deletion from one person. that is essentially. and the prime minister also said , we want to convene a discussion. we want to be able to give the private sector, the unions man the government and we want to talk about this. and over the course of the next several months there was a very heated discussion. the alternatives are laid out. the leaders said, we have a choice. we could either do with the imf says or we can cut wages.
Search Results 0 to 3 of about 4

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)